Seeking conversion versus advocating tolerance in pursuit of social change. ^Social influence research has traditionally assumed that a motive for social acceptance underlies yielding to social influence (Deutsch and Gerard, 1955), not exerting social influence. Web-pooled knowledge -diverse perspectives -others can challenge us to think deeper and more creatively group decision making (disadvantages) -individuals have group goals besides What kind of social influence can. 13. ed. Importantly, most of these studies were conducted within the information processing (persuasion) framework, elucidating cognitive responses to a minority (vs. majority) advocacy and eventual attitudinal changes on the objects of advocacy (e.g., Mackie, 1987; Baker and Petty, 1994; Erb and Bohner, 2001; Martin and Hewstone, 2008). Status, ideology, and integrative complexity on the US Supreme Court: rethinking the politics of decision making. Caporael, L. R., and Baron, R. M. (1997). Soc. Adding to these theoretical and analytical reasons are powerful pragmatic reasons: ever increasing demands on publishing productivity, which is often used as a proxy for scientific contribution, are easier to satisfy with a minimalist approach to minority influence where social conditions and social responses are reduced to information to be processed or generated, with an individual, rather than a group, as a unit of analysis. The model postulates that the many comparative advantages of the majority position over the minority position generally result in the former being preferred over the later. Rev. Psychol. Understanding their motivations is in the core of psychological approaches to social action, with different models emphasizing a variety of motives that reflect groups moral, fairness, and identity standards. eds. P. A. van Lange, E. T. Higgins, and A. W. Kruglanski (New York: Guilford Press), 181201. Majority and minority influence. - APA PsycNET As an illustration of the epistemic value of the time perspective approach to understanding the consequences of successful minority influence, and a test of the above-mentioned Hypothesis 1, consider a longitudinal study that examined reactions of a minority faction within a group who successfully converted a sufficient number of majority members to its position to effectively turn themselves into a new majority and ipso facto, the former majority into a new minority (Prislin and Christensen, 2005b, Study 2). F. Butera and J. Levine (New York: Cambridge University Press), 202221. Social Influence and Social Change. Majority influence, for instance, is a normative influence, leading to individuals complying with the norms of the majority. Rev. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1181, Keywords: minority influence, social change, social influence, majority influence, group dynamics, Citation: Prislin R (2022) Minority Influence: An Agenda for Study of Social Change. eds. Social change in the aftermath of successful minority influence. How can the colors around us affect our mood? This socio-cognitive conflict may be resolved over time such that some majority members privately adopt the minority position. Bull. Try the easy-to-remember FORM technique, A new study claims that appreciation of black humor is a sign of intelligence, Asch: Social Influence, Conforming in Groups. M. B. The confidence of a minority can also affect its ability to influence other members. The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. 4. Vol. eds. Studies done in this tradition have generated valuable insights into the nature and outcomes of minority influence, specifying conditions under which a minority exerts influence and the processing underlying such influence. In a 1969 study, participants were presented with a number of slides, and were asked to identify the color shown in each slide in the company of other participants. This change in private opinion prompts a shift in behavior, and a member may promote his or her newly-acquiredview to other members of the group. Gordijn, E. H., de Vries, N. K. and de Dreu, C. K. W. (2002). Research on group-decision making has elucidated the probability of any one faction prevailing as a function of types of decision tasks (Laughlin and Ellis, 1986), and shared cognitions and motivations (Brodbeck et al., 2007; Tindale et al., 2013), especially in the context of jury decision-making (Tindale et al., 2004), and organizational decision-making (De Dreu and West, 2001). She suggests that the result of minority influence, when compared to majority influence, is that the former nurtures divergent thinking, whereas compliance with the demands of the majority reduces differences in opinion amongst a groups members (Nemeth, 1986). (2002). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Mugny, G., and Prez, J. 35, 179199. Yet, most studies on social influence, including minority influence, are one-time affairs that examine the effects of single appeals or single group encounters at a discrete point in time. Whereas any classification of motives is unavoidably imperfect, three broad motives are readily identifiable from the previously mentioned analysis of minority and majority positions (Prislin and Christensen, 2005a; Prislin and Wood, 2005): Social validation or a sense of correctness, social acceptance or a sense of belonging, and social control or access to tangible benefits (e.g., resources, power). 67, 519. To the extent that acceptance means a state of cognitive merging with a group (Baumeister and Leary, 1995), it cannot be satisfied through acquiescence, which implies affiliation, not integration, with others. 17, 475482. doi: 10.1177/1948550610377238, Prislin, R., Brewer, M., and Wilson, D. J. doi: 10.1111/sipr.12072. They have been conducted within the framework of the gain-loss asymmetry model of change in minority and majority positions (Prislin and Christensen, 2005a). 68, 520. Social influence: The role of consensus in attitudes and attitude change, in The Handbook of Attitudes and Attitude change. (2007). This private conversion may cautiously be communicated to others, thus, gradually becoming public. Discover which Jungian Archetype your personality matches with this archetype test. An example of this would be when a green group promotes responsible behavior,such as recycling, as a way of protecting wildlife. ETNOPOLTKA ARATIRMALARI DERGS - Academia.edu Because of the vital role social support plays in sustaining any argued position (Prislin and Wood, 2005), gaining social support by virtue of social change (minority majority) should increase a successful minoritys capacity to continue to advocate their position. 1, 195228. Psychol. 86, 11911201. In Roosevelts understanding, Americans were born through no document; they were made by their encounters with the wilderness and their cultivation of strength, individualism and democratic community their commitment to a set of principles. Gordijn et al (2002) found that a minority was less influential when the number of members expressing an opinion remained constant or decreased, compared to when members perceived the minority to be increasing in numbers. Critical thinkingis discouraged, with dissenters being ostracised by the majority. Moreover, a disciplinary general focus on the individual level of analysis made social change a challenging object of inquiry. Eur. 3. On being influenced while trying to persuade: The feedback effect of persuasion outcomes to the persuader. Levine, J. M., and Tindale, R. S. (2015). J. Pers. eds. Minority dissent and team innovation: the importance of participation in decision making. And there is precious little evidence of real solidarity among Americas diverse minority ethnic groups. eds. Soc. Is there a purpose behind our dreams and nightmares? What does Milgram's obedience study tell us about why online communication can become increasingly harmful? Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: Is being a member of the out-group an advantage? The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. The country broadened the definition of white people enough to maintain power over African Americans and Asian people (and later Hispanics). If you're one of the many people who gets stressed out when it comes to taking exams then we have a few tips for you that will help you to overcome this and really concentrating on achieving good grades. But there also are examples of numerical, non-normative minorities who, while resisting influence from the majority, do not seek social change (e.g., Mennonites in several countries in North and South America). Yet, even a cursory analysis of real life groups will show that this motive features prominently in social influence exchanges. (1997). And in subsequent decades, the United States admitted millions of Italians, Jews and other ethnicities, with their foreign languages, religions and complexions. 117, 497529. It cannot be a goal in and of itself. 28, 640647. None of the proposed models, however, has been tested empirically outside of computational simulations. Such broader acceptance presumably has survival value (Caporael and Baron, 1997). 93, 2332. Which leaves us with the persistent publish or perish culture that discourages high-stakes, time-consuming, logistically demanding, group-oriented research, especially if it is longitudinal. Participants were instructed to sit around a table to discuss the compensation amount, either in seats which were grouped, or in a solitary seat at the head of the table. Learn to interpret the hidden meanings behind the themes of your dreams and nightmares. Moreover, the informational influence strategy may be combined differently with other strategies (e.g., procedural tools, threats, coalition-building) in service of a particular motive. Dynamics of change: Minority influence makes the world go around, in Minority Influence and Innovation: Antecedents, Processes and Consequences. In a test of the above-mentioned hypothesis 2, variations in minority and majority sources persuasibility were examined as a function of their targets responsiveness to their influence appeals (Prislin et al., 2011). Vol. To orient research toward social change, a research agenda is presented, along with a few illustrative studies. (2017). Social influence is the perpetual competition that shapes social relations by targeting social attitudes. C. K. de Dreu and N. K. de Vries (Oxford, UK: Blackwell), 4059. In contrast, and in support of hypothesis 3, change via increased tolerance for diversity within a group dramatically increased attachment and loyalty to the group among those former in the minority (minority majority) while preserving attachment and loyalty to the group among those former in the majority (majority minority) (Prislin and Filson, 2009; Shafer and Prislin, 2011) In short, recognizing that minority influence originates from a variety of motives expands the scope of influence strategies and types of social changes to be considered. Bull. Social identification, self-categorization and social influence. Moscovici, S. (1980). It involves an individual or minority of a population persuading other members to accept their argument, even if this contradicts the more popular view held by the majority. Mackie, D. M. (1987). Maas, A., Clark, R. D. and Haberkorn, G. (1982). Pers. Minorities influence majority opinion primarily through. (eds.) Refining the agenda as further theoretical developments and empirical findings outline should be relatively easy. Nemeth, C. J. Specifically, a minority faction was created by having most confederates oppose the participants stance on one or more socially important issues; conversely, a majority faction was created by having most confederates support the participants stances. Vol. Minority influence: A meta-analytical review of social influence processes. Bull. S. Papastamou, A. Gardikiotis, and G. Prodromitis (London: Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group), 173197. 95, 189225. This may explain the snowball effect of minority influence, whereby individuals are attracted to a viewpoint on the basis that they believe it is becoming more acceptable, and is gaining popularity amongst other members. Minority influence is a type of social influence which results in a change ofviews amongstthe majority of members within a group. This has been recognized in the literature on social movements or social actions as vehicles for effecting social change. Yet, answering some questions, including those about minority influence in generating social change, requires just such kind of research. While standing firm, minorities must also convey a level of open-mindedness in acknowledging others positions to avoid being perceived as rigid (Papastamou and Mugny, 1985). A., and Mugny, G. (1996). His American nationalism was defiantly civic rather than only ethnic or racial in nature. What the Majority Minority Shift Really Means for America, https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/24/opinion/us-census-majority-minority.html, Joseph Prezioso/Agence France-Presse Getty Images. There is likely no better contemporary example of the power of minorities to instigate social change than a growing recognition of the urgent need for the humankind to address the cause and impacts of climate change. Minorities who accept rather than challenge the status quo, so long as they themselves are not challenged, are a minority within the minority world. Moscovici broke the spell, pointing out that the conceptualization runs afoul of a self-evident truth about the ever-changing world. Tindale, R. S., Nadler, J., Krebel, A., and Davis, J. H. (2004). Teaching as social influence: empowering teachers to become agents of social change. What can a person's eyes tell you about what they are thinking? Itslike in the Milgramstudies in which people were less Vol. Psychol. The unknown of the new position, it was hypothesized, was largely due to the seemingly contradictory meaning of the conversion or former opponents sway to the minority position that underlies social change. Because gains are experienced less intensely than the comparable losses (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979), changes away from the minority position should elicit positive reactions that are weaker than negative reactions to changes away from the majority positions. The reasons for this development are complex. Since majorities are often unconcerned about what minorities think about them, minority influence is thus rarely based on normative social influence. (2000). Measure your stress levels with this 5-minute stress test. Despite his susceptibility to eugenics and racial theories of supremacy, Roosevelt also offers us a way forward. This poses an additional challenge to applying many insights from the prevailing literature on a minority impact toward a social-psychological understanding of social change. ^Search was performed using the following key words: minority influence, defiance, deviance, innovation, social influence and change/effect/impact. A final observation regarding minority influence is that, after being successfully persuaded by a minority, people tend to forget the origins of their new views. This phenomenon, known as social cryptomnesia, often occurs when a person held negative views of the minority whose views they adopted. Levine, J. M., and Prislin, R. (2013). doi: 10.1037/h0046408. Revels in Groups: Dissent, Deviance, Difference, and Defiance. ed. S. Moscovici, A. Muchi-Faina, and A. Maas (Chicago: Nelson-Hall), 233251. Hardin, C. D., and Higgins, E. T. (1996). ________ is the first step in the foot-in-the-door technique. R. Martin and M. Hewstone (New York: Psychology Press), 285312. Finally, different motives may call for different types of social change. Within this context, evidence exists J. Soc. In the immediate aftermath of social change, the new majority showed little attachment to the groupa finding consistent with previous studies (Prislin et al., 2000, 2002; Prislin and Christensen, 2002, 2005b). (2012). This original momentum may subsequently garner greater support and even turn majorities into advocates for change who, in the process of social cryptomnesia, often forget its originators (Mugny and Prez, 1989). Psychol. In spite of a remarkable scientific output, research on minority influence has not addressed its original question about social change. (2002). Prislin, R., Boyle, S., Davenport, C., Farley, A., Jacobs, E., Michalak, J., et al. Pers. Prislin, R. (2010). Moscovici, S., Lage, E. and Naffrechoux, M. (1969). Decision making, in Group Processes. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1095, Prislin, R., and Christensen, P. N. (2005a). Acad. In the subsequent decades, scores of studies have tested (Wood et al., 1994), expanded (Nemeth and Walacher, 1983; De Dreu and West, 2001), and challenged (Latan and Wolf, 1981; Tanford and Penrod, 1984) Moscovicis ideas. In 2015, the Census Bureau published a report projecting that by 2044, the United States white majority would become merely a white plurality: immigration and fertility trends would lead to Americas ethnic and racial minorities outnumbering its white population. Moscovici, S. (1976). In what follows, the importance of these factors is discussed and illustrated by a few initial explorations. How ingratiation techniques are used to persuade people. Sparked by the early scientific findings about human-induced global warming, the issue was first recognized as an existential threat by only a few whose minority position was often ridiculed, dismissed, distorted, or downplayed. Zimbardo's Stanford prison experiment revealed how social roles can influence How Theodor Adorno's F-scale aimed to identify fascism and authoritarian How false memories are created and can affect our ability to recall events.
Which Of The Following Compounds Is Most Soluble In Water?,
Royal Oaks Dallas Initiation Fee,
Where Can I Get Ashes For Ash Wednesday,
1985 Wichita State Football Roster,
Articles M
